Revealing The Phenomenon of Arrogance in Political Speech from Critical Discourse Perspective

Abstract

Investing in actions meant to emphasize one's sense of superiority by insulting others is known as arrogance. People who are arrogant try to show themselves as unlimited and invincible. Arrogant people frequently hamper effective organizational functioning through behaviors linked to this exaggerated sense of entitled and superiority. This study investigated arrogance from a critical discourse analysis  perspective. An eclectic model of the analysis consists of three levels of analysis namely, types of arrogance , micro analysis, and Macro analysis of the data under the study. As well as the methodology replies on the qualitative analysis only and the data collection spotlights on the particular people rather than another.