A SEM Analysis of Factors Influencing Knowledge Sharing among Research Teams in Heilongjiang's Educational Institutions
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to identify and examine the key factors influencing knowledge transfer within university research teams, develop a structural equation model (SEM) that illustrates the relationships among the identified influencing factors, and propose evidence-based strategies for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of knowledge transfer by drawing on the SEM findings and integrating insights from focus group discussions with research team members and policy stakeholders. This research elucidates the relationships among these variables. Drawing from a stratified random sample of 501 valid research teams from public and private universities in Heilongjiang Province, the study integrates both qualitative and quantitative data to assess six latent variables: knowledge characteristics (KC), sharing channels (KSC), sharing environment (KSE), knowledge providers (KP), knowledge recipients (KR), and the level of knowledge sharing (KSL). The SEM results demonstrate in the equation of KSL = 0.81KC + 0.94KSC + 0.95KSE + 1.01KP + 0.86KR, showing all five latent variables positively and strongly influence Knowledge Sharing Level (KSL), with Knowledge Providers being the most influential. Knowledge Sharing Environment and Channels also contribute significantly, while Knowledge Recipients and Knowledge Characteristics have strong supporting roles. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of knowledge sharing, highlighting the importance of proactive contributors, supportive environments, and effective knowledge absorption mechanisms. It can be applied that factors such as trust atmosphere, leadership support, knowledge integration ability, and knowledge-sharing willingness significantly enhance the efficacy of knowledge exchange. The findings offer practical insights into improving collaborative research practices and advancing institutional innovation capacity. The study concludes by proposing actionable strategies for university administrators and policymakers to foster a more conducive environment for knowledge transfer in academic settings.